(-odemus)
Today I have been re-re-reading the John 3 story of Jesus and Nicodemus, which starts to feel like one of those Two Ronnies sketches where one of them is answering the question before last, or some such...
Nic - hello, we all know you're a great teacher and must be Godly because of what you're doing
Jesus - you must be born again/from above/whatever to see the Kingdom of God
Nic - how can a person go back into his mother's womb and be born all over again?
Jesus - flesh gives birth to flesh, Spirit to spirit, the wind blows where it will...
etc, etc
I think I'd have got confused too.
So, after thinking and puzzling my way through this story and what some clever scholars say about it here's where I ended up.
Nicodemus came to see Jesus at a time of day when they were unlikely to get interrupted - they both had a 'day job' of some sort and night might well have been a good time to meet. It might be highly symbolic, it might not.
Nicodemus believed Jesus to have something going for him, and he came to find out more. What we don't know, because the conversation took a very strange turn.
Nicodemus wasn't afraid to question Jesus when he spoke in riddles (which he does most of the time in the fourth gospel). Nor was he afraid to say 'no, I still don't get it.'
The story more or less peters out by mid-chapter, there is no sense of resolution, so presumably at some point Nicodemus went home.
Nicodemus makes two more, equally brief, appearances in the gospel, and each time his nocturnal visit to Jesus is alluded to, so I half wish I really could crack the code and discern the significance of 'by night.' In chapter 7 Nicodemus seems to me to be speaking up for Jesus when he asserts "does our law condemn people without first hearing them to find out what they are doing." Then he accompanies Joseph of Arimathea to bury Jesus, bringing with him about 75 pounds (almost 5 stone) of myrrh and aloes.
I know that some people think Nicodemus is a 'type' of at least some of the religious leaders and not a real person; I also know that most people give him a pretty bad press, asserting he was an unbeliver, one who came by night to trap Jesus; I know others think that he never came to 'new birth' because he didn't undertsand the words of Jesus. I'd like to take a more positive view of him, as someone who was earnestly seeking, someone who was sufficiently humble not to think he knew all the answers, someone open minded enough to hear what Jesus had to say and brave enough both to ask questions and admit his own inability to grasp concepts. His presence at the tomb for me suggests that he remained at least curious about Jesus, and the provision of anointing spices suggests much more.
What I like about Nicodemus is his humanity and his frailty. I also think his encounter with Jesus is a helpful model for the rest of us when faced with some of the more mysterious and ambiguous things recorded in the gospels - taking time, asking questions and admitting to confusion.
Comments
Whether or not this is a historical account or a symbolic one, it's interesting that Jesus didn't give Nic an ABC of salvation and ask him to say a prayer of commitment. He told him some stuff that didn't make immediate sense (like most of John's gospel getting the point really is the point - when you get it you do!), pushed him out into deeper waters and left him there to learn to swim (or catch the wind). Do I dare do the same and risk the grumbles?
Even if symbolic and unresolved, this story seems to suggest that Jesus' significance can grow even for those who don't at first 'get it'.
Was Nicodemus still in the dark by the end of the gospel? I think not.