Related to my last post, I wonder how many people when they read the Bible are aware of the characters ageing processes? Do we notice that Moses or Daniel (to name but two) get to be old men before a lot of the exciting stuff happens - how many old guys do you know of who spend nights in lions' dens? Do we inadvertently perpetuate a cult of youth or deny the inevitability of growing older because we fear we will drive away the few youthful folk we have? Do we dis-empower or excuse from activity anyone over 35 because we fail to recognise that many, maybe most, were older before God called them? And what might that say to those who bemoan the greyness of Baptist ministry (hey, I'm only 47 I'm really quite young!). It's not that we don't don't need young ministers, we absolutely do, but we need also to recognise that growing older is not a reason to exclude or opt out.
I have a feeling that as life expectancies in the west have increased, and the age of majority has crept generally higher (it was around 12 in Jesus' day) we have come to see the Bible characters as younger than relatively (or even literally) they were. That and the fact that we can move on thirty years in a few pages with minimal dating clues for our 21st century minds to recognise.
Those of us who preach maybe have a responsibility to think a bit more about the ages (actual and relative) of the characters in the stories we employ so that we don't portray either perpetual youth or relentless antiquity, neither of which is valid or helpful.
Comments
I had never noticed that Daniel was a very old man. I vividly remember a "Jungle Doctor" telling of the story on a wind-up slide show with pictures of a young virile Daniel in the lions' den. I've just checked my Children's Bible (Bible Society) and there it is - "Daniel became a very old man…" - but the picture shows a youthful, Daniel with a full head of long black hair being lifted out of the pit.
Anyway, some of us are not grey - we're shiny and pink, so think yourself lucky!