I have just taken delivery of this book which looks really interesting, relevant to what I am researching, and in that delightful way of all my past endeavours to research anything, looks as if someone else has already done what I want to do! There is a link between independence of thought and novelty/originality I have yet to fully understand, but I think it is, generally, OK to discover as new something others have already found, if only because it gives the discoverer a greater sense of ownership of the ideas. Well, that was my reasoning when I realised that Fibernacci had already discovered the numerical sequence I found/invented as an 8-year old!
Essays in the book include:
Between "Romance" and "True History": Historical Narrative and Truth Telling in a Postmodern Age (Shirley A Mullen)
History in Search of Meaning: The Conference on Faith and History (D G Hart)
Whose Story, Which Story? Memory and Identity among Baptists in the South ( Bill J Leonard)
Decoding Conflicted History: Religion and Historiography in Northern Ireland (Ronald A Wells)
Doing Justice to History: Using Narratvie Frames Responsibly (G Marcille Frederick)
I think I will enjoy reading this book, even if I keep saying 'drat, I thought I thought of that.' At least if I do, I'll know I'm not totally off the wall! Even if it turns out I'm ten years behind the times...
History and the Christian Historian ed. Ronald A Wells, Cambridge, Eerdmans, 1998