Anyone with eagle eyes may have noticed I've deleted a comment that purported to be an advert for Manchester SCM.  It wasn't!  It was some clever spam produced by copying a block of text from said SCM website and then linking to a website in the USA concerned with selling tyres!  I do wonder just who is employed to do such peurile work - most blog hosts now have 'robot proof' final steps.

If the real Mcr SCM want to add a comment via my blog to advertise their meetings, OK, but not some annoying person trying to sell their own products or "servcies" ... often not quite as innocuous as tyres it has to be said (beware anything with Greek/Cyrilic characters!).

This week's Baptist Times includes a short report on the SCM gathering in Manchester (I'm sure it's a press release but even so, it's in) and one of our lovely students is quoted in the report whilst another, who holds national role in SCM is on the front row of the photo in a purple top.

I know we're an 'odd' Baptist church being an SCM base but hey, that's part of the delight of who we are.  We love our students to bits (not literally) and on the Univeral Day of Prayer for Students (20th Feb) we are having one of our popular Student Lunches for any and all students and their friends.  If I'm strong enough I might even sneak along - we shall see.

This weeks readings from IBRA follow the title 'Five Marks of a Successful Church' and then proceed to offer six reflections.  This seems to give it a hint of a 'wisdom literature' feel - there are "five marks, even six..." kind of thing.

So what are they?

Light for our path offers:

• Time to make friends in the world
• Valuing every member
• Lifestyle integrity
• The right word at the right time (everyone equipped to bear witness)
• Accepting church (inclusivity)
• Supporting the mission

Words for Today offers essentially a series of sentences:

• A successful church lets go of defences and pretences.
• ... means spontaneous generosity.
• ... inspires exploration, questioning and growing in faith.
• ... empowers the powerless.
• ... pulls down barriers.
• ... lives poverty.

It is interesting how the same set of readings prompts two different lists (albeit not mutually exclusive) and it is interesting what is not included that many 'church growth' how-to manuals might suggest.

I wonder what five (or six) marks of a successful church we would draw up and why.

I wonder how our own churches measure up against either of these lists?

I wonder what the relationship is between success measured with these criteria and things like numbers, baptisms, members admitted etc, and even if there really needs to be one.  I have a suspicion it is perfectly feasible to be a successful church that is static or shrinking in size if success is measured using such values as those above.  If successful is about gospel authenticity then size really does not matter... even if it is rather nice that my church is getting bigger and even more multi-ethnic.

Via BUGB e-news sweep, check this one out - many a true word...

Or come along to our place where we work hard to avoid these ten traps... may not always succeeed but we try.

Yesterday was busy with hospital appointments, chief among them being seeing my oncologist and a radiotherapist to talk about the next phase of treatment.

Part of my treatment will be to take Tamoxifen for five years.  In this day and age where we have the 'right to know' the poor man had to tell me every possible known side effect and what the risk was.  A couple of times he said 'vanishingly small' - which kind of made me smile as medical 'vanishing smallness' is bigger than nuclear industry 'vanishing smallness'.  On the basis that the risks he was alluding to were less than the risk of being run over by a passing motorist, I wasn't troubled; at the same time I was glad I have an above average knowledge of common risks to help me make sense of what I was being told.

Then off to meet the radiotherapist, who it transpires lives near Hunterston and knows lots of people who work there (on balance of probability she will know someone I've met at some point).  She was suitably amused - and I think pleased - to have a patient who understood and was interested in the radiotherapy.  The doses involved are very large, but sophisticated equipment means they are also very targeted.  I had to smile when she was explaining why you can't use some skin products because they contain metals and we simultaneously said 'scatter' as the effect on the radiation.

So, two good consultations that were helpful and informative as well as tapping into parts of my life experience.  As I say all too often, nothing is wasted.  I don't think my past experiences were somehow preparing the way for this, rather I think that these are the things I notice and connect with because of my past experience.  Let's face it, had I not told the radiotherapist  about my past she probably wouldn't have talked in semi-technical language.  And if my oncologist knew I was a former risk assessor he'd probably be terrified to quote any figures!!