I have just typed up my monthly minister's letter for the church magazine and also done a quick report on our Pentecost events.  I have chosen to do something I very rarely risk - I have thanked named individuals, albeit en bloc, for their contribution to the events.  A high risk strategy, because someone may have been missed and will be miffed, but overall a useful exercise because it shows that 2 out of 3 church folk were actively involved in making the events happen, and that even one of my ninety somethings was on a stall all afternoon.

Whilst some people are too frail to have helped, most of those who could have did, and that is what's worth shouting about.  In few churches would two thirds of the membership be motivated to get stuck in to a missional event - but imagine what might happen if they did...

So, to the good people of Dibley Baptist Church a mega massive WELL DONE!

This week the Baptist Times (BT) has listed in its fun loving Beattie's Diary column those of us who blogged about Assembly.  So if Beatttie sent you here, a warm welcome to my corner of Blogland, I hope you enjoy your visit.  Contrary to what you might have inferred from Beattie's column, you don't have to agree with me to visit or to comment - given I average around 1000 visits a month I am sure many don't share my views.  Some of my blog-friends I have never met in real life, others I know socially or professionally and we disagree on lots of things - but we all seem to think that Baptists are lovely but crazy (or crazy but lovely) people and/or we enjoy writing or reading about ideas to do with life, faith and mission.

Way back when, when I was still a spotty teenager, Maureen Lipman was Beattie for a totally different organisation, a kind of crazy Jewish auntie whose big concern was 'you got an "ology."'  I always imagine the BT's Beattie in a similar vein - maybe this kind of stuff is "blogology?!"

Anyway, if you are visiting for the first time, don't take me or my stuff too seriously, but do be open to new-to-you ideas.  Feel free to comment - whatever you think of my twaddle.  Oh, and keep reading Beattie's column!! 

To plagiarse the song I learned in Sunday School all those decades ago.

Today's Baptist news esweep includes this link to a post on the ethical responsiblities of Baptist bloggers.  The author is correct in noting caution in our wording and the need for a repsonsible attitude but I was left feeling that this was a bit eggs, grandmother and suck arranged into a well known phrase or saying.

Most of the time most Baptist/Christian bloggers - or at least those who I read - are very gracious in what is posted.  Sure we use popular language and the odd expletive might creep in.  Sometimes we get annoyed and let others know it.  And even sometimes we get it wrong.  Well, we are, afterall, human.

I did wonder what might happen if the archangel Gabriel started posting chunks of the Hebrew Scriptures (OT) cos there are parts which are pretty not nice, not polite and not calm.

Be careful little bloggers what you blog - not because of the Father up above, cos the song says he's looking down in love - but because you just might upset other people with your tone and vocabulary.  Of course we should be careful and responsible, and the article is clearly not against blogging per se, just perhaps hints at something I'd find a bit too holy to be helpful.

Altogether now...

So watch your ears, your eyes, your hands, your feet, your blog... 

Every now and then someone sends me a list of allegedly real "church bloopers."  Here is one I actually saw this week...

"Wednesday morning gentile exercise to music"

Pontius pilates maybe?

Becuase my brain is still largely in post-Pentcost mush, I decided to crib a communion liturgy rather than writing my own this week.  I wanted something that felt intune with the relational, hospitable, missional view of Trinity I want to try to explore.  In the Baptist brick (Gathering for Worship, an excellent resource just way too big for a handbag let alone a pocket) is a liturgy for 'table fellowship' which I liked but felt was not quite right for my congregation.  I like the words, I like the participative style, but I'm not a big fan of being presented with large chunks of unseen prose to read, so I wasn't about to inflict it on other people, especially as many of them are quite vociferous in their dislike of printed liturgy.  So, in the end I adapted it for three voices, simply because in my congregation it is me plus two deacons up front.  Maybe we can manage something just a tad Rublevian (if there is such a word?) with the congregation taking the role of the unseen fourth person?

Anyway, for those who don't have access to Gathering for Worship, here is my adaptation - I hope that I'm not breahcing copyright too badly, and the orignal version is onpages 43 to 45 of said book.  I have tried to mark adaptations in a different colour but may have missed a few - mainly they are changes from first person singular to plural and for more overtly trinitarian (rather than binitarian!) scriptures..