Today the latest issue of BMS Mission Catalyst landed on my doormat.  It is one of umpteen Christian publications that do so.  It is one of the few I read cover to cover; one of the few that I can say I make time for.

This one is about the Bible and about attitudes to its inspiration, purpose and reliability, to name but three.  Now rocket science it is not, but it does have a level of honesty which some will find discomfiting, especially if they have managed to evade any proper Biblical studies, church history - or even failed to read the stuff that is printed in the back of the Good News Bible I've had since my teens or the beginning of the Lion Handbook.

Trouble is, I suppose, very few people will actually read it.  Those who have a more fundamentalist view will dismiss it as 'liberal' and those who accept probably already know what it says.  It needs to get past ministers (at whom it is aimed) to 'people in the pew'.

Anyway, if you are interested and don't have direct access to a paper copy, you can always read it on line here (though having just looked it hasn't appeared there yet!  It is issue 2/12.  Plenty of other interesting issues to look at in the meantime)

Whoops, I had two No 22 posts... and it seems either no-one noticed or everyone was too polite to comment (assuming of course that the comments are working at the moment...)

Anyway, it's Friday, I've had a great morning being very busy, and it's time for a break and a blog.

Today's readings are:

Psalm 107:1-3, 17-22
Daniel 12:5-13
Ephesians 1:7-14

Having played with the psalm already I'm not planning on a revisit.  The Daniel is just plain bewildering, and all attempts to explain it are probably wrong.  So that leaves the Ephesians passage which is well worth a little ponder...

For by the blood of Christ we are set free, that is, our sins are forgiven. How great is the grace of God, which he gave to us in such large measure! In all his wisdom and insight God did what he had purposed, and made known to us the secret plan he had already decided to complete by means of Christ.  This plan, which God will complete when the time is right, is to bring all creation together, everything in heaven and on earth, with Christ as head. All things are done according to God's plan and decision; and God chose us to be his own people in union with Christ because of his own purpose, based on what he had decided from the very beginning.  Let us, then, who were the first to hope in Christ, praise God's glory!  And you also became God's people when you heard the true message, the Good News that brought you salvation. You believed in Christ, and God put his stamp of ownership on you by giving you the Holy Spirit he had promised.  The Spirit is the guarantee that we shall receive what God has promised his people, and this assures us that God will give complete freedom to those who are his. Let us praise his glory!  Ephesians 1: 7 - 14 GNB

A very long time ago now, I read a book that challenged evangelical Christians to be more alert to environmental issues at a time when the received wisdom, at least in some parts of evangelicalism, was that (a) the earth was flawed and destined for destruction anyway and (b) it was there to be exploited in the meantime.  A couple of decades on, it is terrifying to think that people of good will and profound faith thought that way.  The little book I read all that time ago showed me a very different way of reading scripture, that showed God's profound love for the whole of creation.  Passages such as this one from Ephesians formed part of the argument the book put forward.

It is probably fair to say that most evangelical Christians, at least in Europe, have a reasonably good attitude to environmental issues.  We switch off lights; we turn down the heat; we turn off taps; we recycle sermons plastic, glass, paper... But it is also probably fair to say that the view that the universe is headed for perdition or oblivion is still quite widespread, very much contra scripture.

Reading this little extract, we begin with a nice evangelical statement - by Christ's blood we are freed from sin.  However, what we don't get next is something along the lines of 'and this is your ticket to heaven away from the nasty, hell-bound earth'.  No.  We get something more amazing and wonderful that is God's 'secret plan' (Don't you love that concept?  I do!)...

This plan, which God will complete when the time is right, is to bring all creation together, everything in heaven and on earth, with Christ as head.

What is, I think, challenging about this Ephesians passage is that it brings together in one place ideas held very dear by evangelicals and liberals, by universalists and whatever the opposite is.  There is a kind of both-and going on here, I think.  Yes, Christ died to redeem us from sin but also to redeem everything from sin... it is personal and universal in scope.  It is, I think a helpful reminder than none of us has the whole truth and that God's 'secret plan' is revealed only slowly (in human terms) as we begin to grasp the enormity of what it means both in the here-and-now and in a framework of eternity.

I guess the rub is that a consumerist use of the planet is sinful, and therefore necessitates the redemption wrought by Christ.  That gives me pause for thought.

A secret plan, God,

Do you really have a secret plan for all creation?

'Mysterious ways'

Is probably a more accurate rendering

But less enticing

Less exciting

Perhaps Francis of Assisi

Glimpsed this plan

In his canticle

All Creatures of our God and King...

Like the psalmists before him:

Tree clapping their hands

Stars singing

The heavens declaring...

How did we lose our way?

Become so utilitarian?

When did we forget this thread

Woven through

All scripture?

Teach me to love your creation

To tread lightly on your sacred earth

To work with you to bring all things together

Under Christ

Forgive my sins

Of wastefulness

And greediness

Of complacency

And criticism

Forgive me

Help me forgive myself

Help me forgive others

And

Having glimpsed your secret plan

Help me to work with you

To bring it to pass.

Anyone who has known me for any length of time knows I am a bit of the John 15-aholic.  Although it was the good people of Dibley who chose to make banners based on it, I'm sure my pre-occupation with it was influential in that decision.  And I don't think there is a congregation I've worked with in the last umpteen years that hasn't been subjected to my take on it.  So I was delighted to spot this on the Beyond 400 website which echoes so much I have pondered and thought and said.

Pruning is, I am sure, painful for the poor plant, but it is necessary for its health.  It is fruitful branches that get pruned, not unfruitful ones - we need to name and clebrate past 'harvests' rather than simply consign to the 'bin' activities or practices that are now obsolete.  Only if people feel their past work is valued are they able to embrace the new.  It's a lesson I remind myself of from time to time.  Maybe as BUGB (and BUS and BUW et al) move forward, we need to keep it in mind too?

Passing the half way mark, and into the fourth week of Lent now.

Today's diverse and intriguing selection of passages is

Psalm 107:1-3, 17-22
Genesis 9:8-17
Ephesians 1:3-6

As it happens, I read them in GNB as that is the default version on the software I happen to have on this computer.  I'd love to check a whole heap of translation but the two online tools I use - Bible Gateway and Oremus - seem to be 'down' today (see* at end of post)  And I am way too lazy to drag several big Bibles off my shelves to read what they say, but have checked a couple.  Obviously the key message is identical, but nuances vary.

Of the three, it was the psalm, or part psalm, that caught my attention, especially the beginning of verse 17...

Some were fools, suffering because of their sins and because of their evil;
they couldn't stand the sight of food and were close to death.
Then in their trouble they called to the LORD, and he saved them from their distress.
He healed them with his command and saved them from the grave.
They must thank the LORD for his constant love, for the wonderful things he did for them.
They must thank him with sacrifices, and with songs of joy must tell all that he has done.

Psalm 107: 17 -22 GNB

"Some were fools..."

CEV says, 'some of you were foolish...'

NRSV says, 'some were sick through their sinful ways, and because of their iniquities endured affliction'

NIV says, 'some became fools...'

Hebrew interlinear would give something like, 'because of their iniquity through the way of fools...'

Interesting.  At one extreme, GNB and NIV, people are called fools, at the other, NRSV, no such attribute is assigned, in between lies the Hebrew and CEV, which denote foolishness.  The distinction between terming a person a 'fool' and their actions 'foolish' is subtle but important.  Especially since there are the scary words of Jesus in the Matthew 5:22

"But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, 'Raca,' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell." NIV, inclusivised.

Lots of Bibles have a footnote here, because 'fool' is a word used carelessly and casually in contemporary English, suggesting stupidity, ignorance, daftness, silliness etc.  But for the first century hearers, so we are told, it meant 'some one who was morally deficient'.  And so we also need to heed Matthew 7:1-2

“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."

To say nothing of the line on the Lord's Prayer that trips so readily from our tongues... forgive our sins as we forgive...

Do I do or say things that may be construed 'foolish' in an everyday sense?  Undoubtedly.  Does that make me 'a fool'?  I kind of hope not.

Do I say or do, or not say or not do, things that render me morally deficient, things that could be construed 'sin' daily.  Alas, if not the kind of things that will ever make tabloid headlines, then yes, I do.  Am I sinner?  Of course I am.

But... if I take seriously what the Bible says, and specifically what Jesus says, I have no right to judge anyone else and assign them the title 'fool' or 'morally deficient' or a 'sinner' that privilege lies with God alone.  That means those whose actions or in-actions I perceive as sin-filled.  Perhaps I am permitted to express my disquiet, but I have no right to pronounce judgement.  I am in danger hear of tying myself into theological knots!  Surely sin should be named - injustice, idolatry, greed, lust, etc, etc.  Yes, it should.  But not as if I am judge, jury and executioner.  Oh dear, I have rambled along and ended up no clearer than when I began... I really am a wandering Aramean in a wilderness of bewilderment...

Name Un-named, God beyond defining

How easily words trip from my tongue

How readily words like 'fool' or 'idiot' are uttered

And cannot be withdrawn

How quickly I cause damage with carelessness of language

(or am hurt by that of others)

How smoothly I slide into judgementalism

That I am somehow morally superior

To those who disagree with my understanding

How often I replay conversations in my head

'Should have said this'

'Wish I hadn't said that'

How do I find the balance?

How do I name as wrong that which I am convinced is wrong

And not condemn the person for whom that is not so?

How do I live with disagreement in a way that brings life

Rather than avoids confrontation?

How do I avoid foolishness - stupidity, ignorance, carelessness, callousness?

God who is Word

Transform my words

That Love may motivate each syllable I utter

That Grace may ooze from sentences I speak

That my anxiety and rehearsing of things said or unsaid

May be displaced

By prayer for those

With whom I speak.

*Bible Gateway now back up!

There is in physics, or chemistry, or materials science, or all three, the concept of an elastic limit.  It runs very crudely thus - you can stretch something by so much and when you let go it returns to its original length and state.  If you stretch it beyond its elastic limit, it cannot do this, it is damaged, weakened and unable to fulfil its intended role.  Usually, from my limited experience of experiments related to this, the yield point occurs close to one end, not exactly in the middle.  You could try it, I suppose, with a rubber band, keeping on stretching it just a bit further and a bit further until it breaks.  I am wondering if there is an analogy here for churches that endeavour to be broad?  Is it possible to stretch too far or too often, and so lead to inevitably snapping off of some part?

There is another concept, the ductile-brittle transtion that occurs in some metals at certain temperatures, and was, if anyone is vaguely interested, the flaw in the design of the Liberty Ships.  Essentially, above this temprature, metals are ductile, bendable, malleable, shapeable.  Below this temperature they are hard, brittle, fragile, easily snapped and broken.  Is there maybe an analogy here for churches attempting to tackle thorny topics?  How do we keep ourselves ductile rather than brittle?  Is such a transition inevitable under certain 'temperatures' or can we find ways to remain ductile?

When I read or hear stuff in the media about churches at the moment, it all feels very polarised, lots of brittleness, lots of talk of limits being reached.  I find, too, that I become more hard and spikey in my responses... is it possible to remain stretchy without snapping?  Is it possible to avoid the chill of the transition to brittleness?  Is the good ship Liberty in Christ doomed to break up in a sea of disagreement?

I wish I had some answers... instead I try to focus on doing what God has called me to do, being who God has called me to be, and hoping that's good enough.