I forgot to say....

I HATE WORD LIMITS!

Thought it was 200 to 250, then found it was 500 and now have too many words!

This morning I've been working on a review of a book for a Baptist publication.  Sometimes I wonder why I set myself up for this - invariably I get reqeusts to review books by people I know about subjects that are (a) close to my heart (b) emotive and (c) complex.

There's the review I'd like to write, and the one that I need to write - and there is often a huge gulf between them!  A gulf of emphasis and adjectives I guess.  A book can be 'important' and worth commending to others and still be 'dull' 'repetitive' and even 'annoying in places'.

Of course I won't mention the dull, repetitive, annoying bits, but I also won't say this was a right rivetting read that got to the nub of a topic.  I guess what isn't said is as significant as what is!

The other book is a tad easier to review in many ways - don't know the author, like his approach and can simply stick to facts about it.

Maybe the world of book reviewers is just too small - and I sure am glad I don't have any whole books out there!

Not a neat reflection, just some stuff going round my head.

Today's PAYG was the parable of the person who was let off a huge debt they could not pay and then demanded with menance the paymnet of a titchy debt they were owed (Matt 18:21 - 19:1).  And it got me thinking about how what tends to happen is that Christians look at other people's 'sins' or 'debts' as huge whilst seeing their own as small.  The tendency to equate our unthinking, selective legalism with righteousness; the tendency to assign greater sinfulness to some aspects of life than others; the tendency to place oursleves in the role of God.

Social media is busy with reports 'shares' and 'retweets' of Vicky Beeching's decision to 'come out' as a lesbian (here).

BMS are launching a new inititative in relation to gender-based violence, focusing on that against women and girls, whilst acknowledging it also happens against men and boys (here and here).

I guess what strikes me is that, overall, we give far more Christian time and energy to the sleeping arrangements of consenting adults in committed relationships than we do to the violation of those who are powerless to act...

Kyrie Eleison,

Christe Eleison,

Kyrie Eleison

Back in the dark ages of the early 1980s, I wrote an essay as an entry in a competition to win a scholarship to an international conference in Geneva.  My entry was successful - even if the conference was largely rather dull, not least as my employer had dictated which sessions I must attend.  Having drafted my essay - which was something about the role of the engineer I think - I passed it to my training manager, a gruff man in his late fifties.  His one comment was that I had referred to engineers only as 'male' and he said, "you should use the feminine".  At the time I didn't really 'get' it; inclusive language was unknown and 'the male includes the female'.

Today I was reading a document written by someone I respect greatly that referred to ministers exclusively as male, and I saw red!  If an organisation claims to affirm women ministers (and this one does, albeit belatedly) then it can't simply refer to ministers as he.  I absolutely would not wish to replace all male language with all female language, two wrongs don't make a right, but surely to goodness we could have 'his/her' 'she/he' 's/he' or even 'their'... it's not rocket science, but words are powerful and so long as ministers are referred to only in the masculine nothing will change.

Here endeth the rant!

Eleven years ago I left 'vicar school' with no idea what the future held.  After meeting several churches and two 'preaches with a view' (sole nominee in Scottish speak) I had no call.  It was hard, really hard.  The college and the union were wonderfully supportive, and I remember being told by an experienced minister that this happens every year... for no obvious reason some of the most gifted and talented and, well, divinely called people don't settle in the average time frame.  Obviously I did settle, and I will always be grateful to Dibley who took a chance on me then, and the Gathering Place who still do so now.

This year I know of three people - two women and one man - who have fallen foul of that same system.  All three are gifted... one I know first hand, they do supply preaching for us, two I know by repute.  And it sucks - big time.  The reasons they don't settle are, frankly, petty and judgemental, excuses given after meeting them that were obvious from their profiles submitted ahead of time.

I believe in the settlement process, for all its flaws and failings, I just wish God didn't have to have a Plan B and plan C and a plan D for some of the best ministers.  In the end, the churches that take the risks get the blessings, and the churches that say no lose out.  But when you're going through it, it's rubbish.

Thoughts and prayers with H, B and L that I know of, and others that I don't.