Two years ago, I used a couple of jigsaws to help me regain my powers of concentration after my surgery - really good if not totally successful.  Indeed, it is only in the last couple of months I've really felt my brain has been back to something nearing it's proper functionality.  I also discovered that I enjoyed jigsaws, and since then have done the odd done now and then.

Today I began one of this picture called 'cats in need' by Polyanna Pickering:

I think I've done around 100 pieces of the 1000 this afternoon.  It is quite challenging, but a subject that appeals, so well worth the effort.  It will keep me occupied for a nice long time, forcing me to relax and unwind after busy days.

So far, Holly cat has resisted the tmeptation to help...!

OK, so this is a spoof, it's not Anne Hathaway, but I still think it's pretty good... and was evidently done in a single take just as the orginal was...

If you haven't yet seen the film, I'd definitely recommend it.

No, this is not confession time nor self flagellation time, but something that struck me as I have been re-reading commentaries ahead of leading a Bible Study next week on James 3:1 - 12.  The last time I looked at them, last autumn, I confess I skipped over all the detailed analytical stuff, partly cos my brain was still not up for reading Greek, and partly because I was wanting broader brush strokes.  Today, I noticed something in one commentary, then spotted it in another, and yet neither of the writers seemed to spot the irony of what they were (or were not) saying.

The opening of James 3 is roughly thus: 'not many of us should apsire to be teachers, because more is expected of them, and we all make mistakes.' and then moves into a plethora of examples of very small things that have potential for huge impact - whether it is a spark, a ship's rudder or a bit in the mouth of a horse.  All good, self-explantory stuff: little thing, big impact which could be destructive.

The two commentators spent lots of words noting that the start of verse three, in Greek, could be (based on extant manuscripts I assume):

• ei de
• ide
• eide
• idou

The difference seems small when it is written down, but the sentence is changed by whichever is chosen. For example:

if we put bits in horses' mouths....

behold, we put bits in horses' mouths...

As the commentators note, in this case it doesn't matter much which word we choose, because the message isn't substantively altered.  But, whilst they note the need for interperative choice, and one even asks 'how do you decide which is the correct choice', neither makes the connection that seemed to me really obvious - that here, in this text, is a teeny weeny example of just how tricky it is to get this right.  We all make mistakes, a word missed or mistyped here, a punctuation slip there, and the meaning changes, sometimes with catastrophic results.  It is entirely feasible that trascription errors or even poor handwriting exaplin the differences... the pen has like potnetial to the tongue.

All of which has given me an idea to research a little exercise for the participants to share as a 'warm up' if only I can find sufficient suitable words and phrases...

Growing up where I did, the Wars of the Roses and the associated battle for the English throne were not just history, they were local interest.  The third and final primary school I went too had four 'houses' named Gloucester, Warwick, Lancaster and York after some of the key players in that process, and of course the Northamptonshire emblem is a Tudor Rose, the combination of those of Lancaster and York.  So for me, this is interesting at more than a merely intellectual level. 

The Battle of Northampton took place in what is now Delapre Abbey, a place I visited frequently as a child, and where in 1990 two oak trees planted as part of the town's charter 800 year celebrations (technically 1989) are memorials to my Dad - I recall tracking them down one cold autumn day and gathering fallen leaves as a memento. 

I've also spent many happy hours wandering the Bosworth battle field, and eaten a few Christmas meals in the cafe-restaurant there with the lunch club that Dibley BC ran for five years.

History - his story - and my story, overlapping and interconnecting in some small way.  Well it interests me!!

Each week in Morning Worship, we have a psalm or an anthem, chosen by our Musical Director (sounds way more posh than reality, but he is absolutely BRILLIANT).  This morning we had one of my favourites:

I will be with you wherever you go.
Go now throughout the world!
I will be with you in all that you say.
Go now and spread my word!

Come, walk with me on stormy waters.
Why fear? Reach out, and I'll be there.
    Chorus

And you, my friend, will you now leave me,
or do you know me as your Lord?
    Chorus

Your life will be transformed with power
by living truly in my name.
    Chorus

And if you say: 'Yes, Lord, I love you,'
then feed my lambs and feed my sheep.
    Chorus

Gerard Markland (born 1953) © 1978 Kevin Mayhew Ltd

If memory serves correctly (it may not) this was the piece we used at the first service I took after I made my cancer diagnosis public; certainly it was used in a service around that time, and really spoke to my heart at a time when I was utterly terrified.  It feels pertinent that we sang it today, the second anniversary of my surgery, when I feel happy, fulfilled and very much alive. 

I am really miffed that I can't find a video or mp3 of this gorgeous piece online, so I can't share it with you, but maybe you can find a recording somewhere (for anyone in the know, a recording of the service will be on the Gathering Place website in due course.)