Church was great again today... I am so privileged to be where I am doing what I'm doing.  Lot's of lovely comments about my service and lots of new faces once again... life is good, God is great.

Three words really at the heart of what today was about, three characteristics that emanate from God and inform our relating to God, to creation, to others, to ourselves...

Love

Hope

Faith

If, as John 3:16 tells us, God loved the cosmos so much God's Son entered the cosmos to save the cosmos, what does that tell us about God and about our response?

It forces us to care about the whole of creation

It forces us to care about all other people

It forces us to care about ourselves

The two 'Great Coomandments' fit with this too...

Love God with every ounce of your existence

Love the people with whom you share the planet

Love yourself the way you love others

All this blows my brain but it's what it means to live in the light of Bible.

God never stops loving all that God has made

God never stops hoping that the Kingdom will be fulfilled

God never stops 'faithing' that God's will be done.

Thank God for such a God!

A bit slow on the uptake here...

October was breast cancer awareness month, November is prostate cancer awareness month.  We probably all know someone with this invisible, silent killer of men though they may not tell us.  I certainly know a few now and have known a few in the past.

Movember is a slightly quirky thing to grow a moustache for a month (Google the word you'll find our more) in aid of the charity and to raise awareness.

One of the things for men having chemo is loss of their facial hair, which if they are bearded or moustachioed must be very hard to deal with.  We think of the psychological impact on women of hair loss but not that on men.  To be able to choose to be clean shaven or not is something most people will never think about unless/until that choice is taken away from them.

I have to confess I'm not a beard/moustache fan but I'm glad that people are taking up this challenge, if only for 30 days...

A while ago I mentioned that at some point my treatment might see a change of drugs to a regime that *may* (for which read *will*) cause nails to fall off because of interruption to the growth phase and increased photo-sensitivity. The recommended means of reducing/preventing this is to paint your nails with dark nail varnish

Having seen my oncologist this week, it is now "quite likely" that this change will occur so I thought I ought to conduct my own clinical trial of nail varnish ahead of time, I mean I wouldn't want to discover that the varnish itself causes my nails to drop off would I?  So today a trip to the local branch of "Amazing Pharmacy Products" to pick up four colours - enough, I deemed for my trial.

So, the first stage of the trial demands certain assumptions for it to be possible...

• that left and right hand nails will behave the same way
• that finger position is not significant
• that toe nails will behave the same as finger nails (cos I'm too lazy to paint 20 nails just now!)

Each finger nail is painted with a semi-randomised choice of polish.  It has to be semi-randomised - I need symmetry between hands or I get stressed (I know, on the spectrum blah blah..)  With four colours it means two nails on each hand are the same colour, maybe I should have had five but I wasn't thinking of that then and anyway it was 2 for £5 so it would have to be four or six...

I opted against a double blind trial - painting nails with both eyes closed seemed just too tricky!  Here we have 'purple rain' 'green with envy' 'liquorice' 'blue my mind' and more 'purple rain'.  Nuff said.

It all looks very silly, not least as I keep my nails very short, they aren't exactly a good shape right now and the medical nail varnish method means you have to ensure you cover the edges as these are the weakest point - beauty treatment it ain't.  The woman who taught me manicure 30+ years ago would freak!

Anyway, phase one of the trial is to ensure that by tomorrow morning I still have nails... OK so we all know I will but this has to be done scientifically... the varnish just might make them fall off.

Not sure I'm courageous enough to go to church with multi-coloured fingers but I just might opt for one colour that matches my outfit...

Or spouses.  Spice sounds more fun though.

This is something I've thought for ages but never got round to posting.

In each of my churches I have had ministers' spice - wives and widows - and they are just such a wonderful blessing to the girlie rev because they know what life in a manse really is like.

Every now and then I get a card from Ruby (not her real name) a minister's widow who always has something encouraging to say, and who was always a great ally for "interesting" funerals!

From time to time Ruth (also masked) sends me an email that pops up to cheer my day and regularly expresses her appreciation for my preaching.

Rose, Norma and Elin (OK the masking is thin if you know who any of these five spices in two churches are!) always smile at me across the church on a Sunday and share a laugh at the oddities of church life.

Not one of these women has had an easy life.  Some of them have experienced great personal tragedy in the very public sphere of the church.  They have seen their husbands hurt by what churches do at their worst and they have seen the impact on their children (where relevant) of living in the goldfish bowl.  Yet each is still there, week by week, "keeping on keeping on" as Ruby says, and loving their ministers as only the spices can.

And I love them.  I love their honesty, their insight, their wit and wisdom, their faithfulness and the sense of solidarity they express.

It's not that these women are any more wonderful than anyone else, it's just that their ministry of spiciness is so easily overlooked.  So, for today at least, let's hear it for the spice!!

Hurrah!  I just emailed a first draught of my MPhil submission to my supervisors.  At a MS Word count of somewhere between 43,000 and 53,000 words (depending what is inlcuded or excluded) it's probably about the right length.  University regs and MS Word of course don't match on how you do the count.  I'm secretly pleased that my bibliography looks long enough and that I have around 350 footnotes... that makes it look cleverer than it is!

Not sure what anyone will make of it - some bits a bit navel gazey - but we shall see.

For now I'm just glad it's in the ether...